GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley for Obama? (For an Instant)
A day after Vice President Joe Biden was glad to be in Iowa, aka Ohio, Iowa's Republican U.S. Senator accidentally "endorses" President Obama.
Among the politicians standing Friday with Mitt Romney in Ames, were Rep. Steve King, who recently linked immigrants to dogs, and Sen. Chuck Grassley, who once called President Obama "stupid."
As they each approached the microphone to speak to a couple of thousand people, who might regret their words first?
The "winner" on this day, if only for a moment, was Grassley.
“We will put America on a new path to a new day with a new President Obama,” Grassley intoned.
Oops.
Grassley caught himself.
“A new president Obama?" he asked nobody in particular. "Pardon me I want to forget that word.”
Things must be getting tiring on the campaign trail. On Thursday, Vice President Joe Biden called out Romney to Iowa voters.
“I mean literally, ladies and gentlemen, this is the guy who’s running all the ads here in Iowa saying he’s going to get tough on China,” Biden said.
Only problem: Biden was in Ohio.
Also See:
Did Steve King Mean to Insult Immigrants When He Compared Them to Dogs?
Kurt B.
7:27 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Little slip-ups like this often get mis-quoted, almost like the title of this blog article. I am sure "Chuck" is NOT for Obama.
David Nova
5:10 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
not for obama? how astute of you to figure that out, kurt! next time anyone makes an obvious slip of the tongue, i'll be sure to check with you for confirmation.
Kathleen Greer
5:22 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
maybe he really is. His inner thoughts came out. He knows Romney is a liar and will destroy this country.
maxine weimer
10:46 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Is that like Biden when he was in Marion, Iowa and kept saying he was in Marion, Ohio? Biden is so confused he dosen't even know where he is!
Joe Dygas
8:06 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Much ado about nothing...consider the blatant lying by obama regarding the fiasco in Benghazi, refusing to come to the aid of American diplomats under fire. Inexcusable and then to repeat numerous times a phony story about some video getting the kooks over there all excited. There is your story Patch, why don't you write about something meaningful!
Jean Hoffman
9:55 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Joe,
Despite the Ambassador's family pleading that his death not be politicized, you are doing so. Shame on you! You take after Mitt, who distributed a press release on the Libya incident while the consulate was still burning. Disgusting!
Todd Richissin
10:47 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Thanks, Joe. This link will take you to our full election coverage. http://ames.patch.com/elections-2
Gail
11:43 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Tired of the whole Benghazi thing and excuses for Bush's failure to keep our nation safe. President Obama has a slew of staff who are SUPPOSE to keep him aprised! He stated in the 2nd Debate, although, Hillary Clinton took the blame, that HE WAS COMMANDER IN CHIEF and he accepts ALL responsibility. He went on to explain he would not stop until he found out who and why the ball was dropped. And to make a statement in the Rose Garden "act of terror" doesn't not have the same meaning "act of terrorism". Look it up in the dictionary, terror relates to any situation where someone is threatened and endangered.
kenneth parsons
12:01 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Mitt does nothing but lie. He is for something when talking to one group and against it talking to another. Oh, and Benghazi? well the presedent and the cia still isn't sure who did it. Four different groups claim they are responsible. Don't blame the president for not jumping the gun and giving the wrong group credit, like Mitt the mouth did.
anlaho
5:13 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Remember what happened in April 1983?, when a van loaded with a bomb exploded in front of the U.S. Embassy and killed 46, including 16 Americans.
. You Neo-cons keep bashing Obama for the Embassy but, have you forgotten what happened in Beirut on Oct. 23rd, 1983?
A van loaded with explosives killed 241 service members, including 220 Marines in their barracks — the Corps' bloodiest day since Iwo Jima. It would drive the U.S. out of Lebanon and lead people, including al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden, to conclude that when America gets its nose bloodied, it pulls back.
The blast lifted the building as much as a foot off the ground. Then the floors pancaked down, killing many of those inside.
The truck shattered the Marines' building with a bomb more powerful than 12,000 pounds of TNT — the biggest non-nuclear explosion since World War II. The van passed between two sentry posts. Not even one Marine got off a single shot at the van, ........why?, because their guns were ordered not to be loaded. hummmm? Our President at the time said and I quote " the United States would never back down from terrorists " unquote.
And what did our fearless leader do to bring these Terrorist to justice that killed our Embassy members and our Marines?, 2 months latter he withdrew the Marines from Lebanon.
Who is this mystery man of who I speak? our 40th President, Ronald Wilson Reagan.
David Nova
5:30 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
@gail: time to get a better dictionary. in google distionary, 'terror' has more than one sense:
ter·ror Noun /ˈterər/
1. Extreme fear
- people fled in terror
- a terror of darkness
2. The use of such fear to intimidate people, esp. for political reasons
- weapons of terror
3. A person or thing that causes extreme fear
- his unyielding scowl became the terror of the Chicago mob
4. The period of the French Revolution between mid 1793 and July 1794 when the ruling Jacobin faction, dominated by Robespierre, ruthlessly executed anyone considered a threat to their regime
5. A person, esp. a child, who causes trouble or annoyance
- placid and obedient in their parents' presence, but holy terrors when left alone
the prez used sense #2.
terrorism consists of acts of terror. if he had said 'act of terrorism' as you suggest, he would have been saying 'act of acts of terror'. why would he want to say something so redundant?
mh1066
7:42 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
the ambassador, made the call on the trip to Benghazi, if thought it was unsafe, he could have called off the trip. As for lack of security, thank the repubs, for cutting the funding to the state department, this had a direct impact on our security at all embassy s
Joseph Robert
1:39 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012
Did you Republicans complain against GW Bush, after his leadership led to these many deadly attacks on US diplomatic posts?
June 14, 2002, U.S. consulate in Karachi, Pakistan
Suicide bomber kills 12 and injures 51.
February 28, 2003, U.S. consulate in Karachi, Pakistan
Gunmen on motorcycles killed two consulate guards.
July 30, 2004, U.S. embassy in Taskkent, Uzbekistan
Suicide bomber kills two.
December 6, 2004, U.S. consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Militants stormed and occupied perimeter wall.
Five killed, 10 wounded.
March 2, 2006, U.S. consulate in Karachi, Pakistan Suicide car bomber
killed four, including a U.S. diplomate directly targeted by the assailants.
September 12, 2006, U.S. embassy in Damascus, Syria
Gunmen attacked embassy with grenades, automatic weapons, and a car bomb. One killed and 13 wounded.
January 12, 2007, U.S. embassy in Athens, Greece
A rocket-propelled grenade was fired at the embassy building. No one was injured.
July 9, 2008, U.S. consulate in Istanbul, Turkey
Armed men attacked consulate with pistols and shotguns. Three policemen killed.
September 17, 2008, U.S. embassy in Sana'a, Yemen
Militants dressed as policemen attacked the embassy with RPGs, rifles, grenades and car bombs. Six Yemeni soldiers and seven civilians were killed. Sixteen more were injured.
I didn't think so !
Ed
2:17 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012
Drinking the Fox cool-aid again?
Jean Hoffman
9:53 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012
While you worked at your job, Romney paid just 14 percent tax last year!
Romney made an average of $57,260 PER DAY ($20.9 million divided by 365days)
And, now Mitt wants to lower taxes on the wealthy. Give me a break!
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2012/president/candidates/romney/romney_tax_return_1040_2011/
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/opinion/mitt-romney-needs-a-working-calculator.html?ref=incometax&_r=0
Kathleen Greer
5:27 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Maxine, you must be from another planet. Romney is a liar, he sends his money to the islands so he doesn't pay his fair share and you think that is okay. He could careless about the 47% which I am sure you are part of. If Romney &Ryan govern us, we will be destroyed. Wake up vote Obama-Biden 2012
David Nova
5:44 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
wanting high-income people to pay higher taxes is not socialism, joe. or did i misunderstand you?
maxine, do you make $57K per day? no? then why is your tax rate higher than romney's? (assuming you work, of course.)
foreverhippie
9:01 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012
And he feels that is perfectly fair and right: after all that is how jobs are created; only no jobs were created. If he wnts to gamble with his money, fair enough; but he shouldn't get a lower tax rate for it, especially since he never seems to loose his bets.
Joseph Robert
10:12 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Who is the bigger liar?
POLITIFACT: Romney is BIGGER LIAR Than Obama
42 percent of Romney’s comments are lies.
28 percent of Obama’s comments are lies
(Total of all Mostly False, False and Pants on Fire
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/mitt-romney/
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/barack-obama/
Joe Dygas
1:59 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." ~Winston Churchill
Therefore, the democrats, obama and his minions, liberal bloggers and so on all fall under this evil spell of self delusion.
David Nova
5:51 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
but, joe, churchill said 'the equal sharing of misery' is a 'virtue'. if churchill called it a virtue, why aren't you for it?
btw, democrats are not socialists. senator bernie sanders is a socialist. he's not a democrat.
mh1066
7:53 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
joe dygas: If Obama is a socialist, than every president, before him is a socialist. PS if socialism is a failure, don't tell my Canadian neighbors who spend the winters here in Arizona, in their $ 300,000 vacation homes
maxine weimer
10:55 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Kathleen.. not in this lifetime! You know there is nothing wrong with Romney putting his money in off shore accounts. If you made the kind of money he does you would keep it where the taxes are lower so you could keep more it and if you didn't then you would be an idiot. And BTW maybe you should wake up and prepare yourself for a Romney/Ryan win!
Anatole Pushkin
11:45 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Amazing.
The Greedy Obscurantist Predators (GOPs) are getting stupider and stupider every day. Obama will win.
Keith Best
12:28 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Sorry Anatole Pushkin...Americans that were duped in 2008 are leading to a Romney/ Ryan landslide.
Joe Dygas
1:58 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Not in your wildest dreams!
David Nova
5:56 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
i wish i had your confidence, AP. unfortunately, the stupidity of one's opponent does not guarantee victory. turnout will determine the outcome of this election.
maxine weimer
8:59 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012
NOT!
Julie Kirby
12:54 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
It's good to know the GOPers are falling in line. Seems like just yesterday it was "anyone BUT Mitt."
David Nova
6:16 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
maxine, you say 'we all got bamboozled in 2008'. does that mean you actually voted for obama?
Joe Dygas
1:57 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." ~Winston Churchill
This pretty much sums up the problem with the liberal bloggers here, the democratic party, its candidates from BO on down to whatever...They are what they are ...
maxine weimer
9:13 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
David...Uh no I sure did not vote for Obama in 2008. I guess I should have said it differently like "they" all go t bamboozeled. But I will admitt that I did watch all the debates and I was impressed with his speaking qualities, but I never ever thought about voting for him. Now I know he was chosen because he could articulate well and because he was a smoothe talker and an excellant liar.
maxine weimer
9:14 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
No one in this lieftime will ever convience me that Obama is anything but a socialist.
David Nova
9:49 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
u both wrong. most liberals not socialists, if any. same for democrats. senator bernie sanders only socialist in congress, far as i know. he usually votes with dems because his opinions closer to theirs than to GOP. but he's no dem.
maxine weimer
9:03 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012
+2 Joe
Chloe O'Dea
4:36 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
In an interview On KWQC,
Grassley said he felt Romney had back stabbed him on wind energy and Iowa was going lose 4000 jobs if Romney is elected.
ursulasaulie
8:35 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012
Maxine, based on your comments, you definitely don't know anything about socialism and what its... but what can one expect from repubs//
Joe Dygas
10:43 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012
Ursula, I guess you did not get the definition of socialism aka the democratic party platform. So, to bring you up to speed here...the following explains it clearly.
""Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." ~Winston Churchill
amen
maxine weimer
9:02 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012
ursulasaulie...Read Joe Dygas comment below...It describes Obama to a tee...failure,ignorance, envy and misery...yep that is obama.
Joe Dygas
10:38 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012
I wonder what the mindless liberal bloggers have to say today in the wake of the Des Moines Register's endorsement of Romney for President. Afterall, the Register has supported every socialist since LBJ. I was truly shocked by the Register, I did not think they actually had the intellectual capacity to analyse obama's failed reign. Maybe they are taking some new supplements advertised on the Dr Oz. show!
Julie Kirby
11:07 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012
I'm not at all surprised by the Register's endorsement (they are owned by Gannett, you know), nor am I surprised at the Gazette's endorsement. Newspapers are not in the business of reporting "news" anymore. They are purely business entities concerned with gaining profit through advertising dollars. I should know...I worked at various newspapers throughout my 30-year career.
maxine weimer
7:50 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012
While I am glad to see the endorsement, I have to say the media today absolutely can't be trusted. You can get anything in the world printed as long as you have enough to pay for it. The media really needs to be overhauled with a little tact and truth and stop letting the all mighty dallar speak.
Joe Dygas
8:40 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012
The time for talk is all but over, so, remember in November,
Vote NObama, NObiden, NOclinton, NOdemocrats
if you want a better Iowa and a better America.
maxine weimer
1:46 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012
Three days to go, Obama must go!
Jim Aspen
2:40 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012
The O has got to go.
Maria Houser Conzemius
1:00 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Honestly, I love Joe Biden and enjoyed meeting him at Iowa City's Hamburg Inn 2, but I think his aneurysm earlier in life might have given his brain a permanent case of occasional hiccups. Can't prove that, of course, but I wonder sometimes. Or is it fatigue?
An historian once wrote a book on Ronald Reagan called "Sleepwalking Through History," and didn't know that Reagan was already suffering from Alzheimer's, which can start 25 years before anyone notices.
Joe Dygas
1:04 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
By those standards, Maria, it is quite clear that obama is suffering from early dementia because he seems incapable of performing even basic arithmetic, especially regarding his budget problems and overblown spending.
maxine weimer
2:05 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
I have to admitt that I was so stoked about having Romney be President, and of course he isn't that I never for one second that Obama would actually win another term. It makes me sick to think about it but I just have to deal with it I guess. Even though he can't serve another term, I hope everyone can come together next time to make sure the dems don't win again.
maxine weimer
7:44 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Joe, I think Obama suffers from a huge, over inflated ego and thinks his only job is to parade around and lie to the public.
maxine weimer
7:44 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Joe, I think Obama suffers from a huge, over inflated ego and thinks his only job is to parade around and lie to the public.
Maria Houser Conzemius
6:03 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
maxine, if Hillary Clinton runs again in 2016, I think she'll win. I caucused for Hillary on Jan. 3, 2008, and I plan to caucus for her again if she runs. I hope she does. We'd get a "twofer," two presidents for the price of one. Or would the First Gentleman get a salary for being First Gentleman? Sally Mason's husband gets paid for being a lecturer at the U of I, which is fine, but he also gets paid for "fundraising," although the female spouses of Iowa's two other public universities do not.
judith harlan
7:06 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
I HAVE lost faith in all media. In the past media was trusted to keep an ear to the ground and fingers at the pulse of the public. Not anymore. Money talks and the media has its hand out. Apathy is our downfall! How to keep on trying with a public that is too comfortable?
maxine weimer
7:35 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Judith, You are 100% correct. We can't trust the media anymore, not the news on tv, the newspapers, not anything. Money DOES talk, and its really sad because you can't believe anything they say anymore.
maxine weimer
7:35 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Judith, You are 100% correct. We can't trust the media anymore, not the news on tv, the newspapers, not anything. Money DOES talk, and its really sad because you can't believe anything they say anymore.
maxine weimer
7:30 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Maria, I will say this and I think you know how hard it is for me, but Hilary would be the ONLY democrat that I would be ok with winning. I like alot of her ideas, and she is ambitious enough to get the job done. And Bill is a bonus.
maxine weimer
10:09 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Gosh.....did I just say that?
maxine weimer
7:45 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
not sure why my comment is doubled here, but did only type it once!
Joe Dygas
10:55 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Max, didn't you mean Bill was a boner rather than a bonus? ;-)
maxine weimer
11:15 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
OMG Joe you are hilarious! Yeah I think I was temporarily insane when I said that, although I remember the economy being pretty decent when he was president. But I have to admitt that I wasn't into politics then, I was too busy raising my family.
Joe Dygas
10:12 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Max: What the dems do not realize about the economy of he 1990's is that that was the tech era of the growth of the internet and related computer hardware...combined with the republican takeover inthe House which force Clinton to compromise on the budget balancing deal . Of course, Bill was a very slippery pol compared to a rigid ideologue like obama.